Proving Romeo and Juliet is not a tragedy.

If somebody were to see someone fall off of a cliff they would believe that it was a tragedy. While on the otherwise hand some people may believe that it was fate. They be both correct answers. Fate spiels a major freakish in a tragedy and/or comedy and sometimes it can even control the outcome. Yet fate creates very much fun and excitement towards literature and it keeps the reader more attentive. Shakespeargon has penitentiary many plays including comedies and tragedies. His tragedies seem to be among his more famous plays and they commonly end in sorrow. However, most of Shakespeares plays are different; they capture an essence of what tragedies really are. Still, many individuals argue if all of Shakespeares tragedies follow away the true characteristics and essence of a tragedy, or if they are rattling controlled by fate. A more commonly argued play is Romeo and Juliet. In this play, Romeo and Juliet are victims of fate and they can non be label tragic heroes. Shakespeare demonstrates this through the protagonists need of tragic flaws, the absence of them having the highest place in caller and due to the lack of hubristic character visualised by them. Shakespeares characters lack much hubristic character. To have hubris one mustiness have an abundance of arrogance and/or pride.

This in disco biscuit blinds the hero from realizing the troubles they create. For instance Romeo has very little hubristic character. Romeo is not unconditional and he is certified of his surroundings. Romeo is not at all self-loving because he does not believe that he is more comely of Juliet than anyone else and ! he lacks pride. In Act 3, Scene 1, Romeo slays Tybalt because Tybalt had slain Mercutio who was a dear takeoff booster to Romeo. When the Prince arrives at the scene Benvolio utters, on that point lies... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper