Justice and Social Order in The Oresteia Essay -- Aeschylus Oresteia

Justice and Social drift in The Oresteia Democracy, emerging in the city-state of A thens, allowed unprecedented power to her citizens. Among these new powers was the susceptibility to legislate. Yet, legislation was non without its problems. First the citizens must agree upon what is just and unjust, and then enforce the law by bringing the unjust to reconcile their viciousness with the public through trial, and finally dispense the appropriate penalty. This evolution was not without concern. The Greeks were attempting to establish a governmental system which would span the middle footing between anarchy and despotism. By the shames played out in Aeschylus tragic trilogy The Oresteia, Aeschylus demonstrates the contrast between anarchy and despotism, and judges them both guilty. Indeed he shows, by the end of the play, that the save way man can be absolved of guilt is by joining leagues with the gods in a joined trend to promote justice. His premise is supported by sequenti ally avocation the criminal legacy of the house of Atreus, and showing that the curse of continued hurt can only be ended by the cooperative effort of man and god. Aeschylus draws his contrast between anarchy and despotism through the main characters in the play. First Atreus, the father of Agamemnon, though never appearing himself in the trilogy is a central figure and the vehicle by which the curse is introduced. His crime is that of anarchy. Second, Agamemnon returns from Troy with the blood guilt of despotism. Next, Clytemnestra, Agamemnons queen, represents a mixture of the two evils in that she portrays a self-serving ruler. Finally Orestes, son of Agamemnon, is introduced as a worshipful man who allows his fate to be determined by the gods in conjuncti... ... of the trilogy it was exhibit the power that democracy wielded. It was able to eliminate anarchy and despotism by the middle ground. Although this had previously been the role of the Erinyes (Eu., ln.526-30), they had through the play prove themselves unsuccessful. Thus at the end of the Eumenides, Aeschylus has the Furies relinquish governance of the city to the citizens, and cede honor on the people (Eu., ln.1016-20). Therefore Aeschylus demonstrated that democracy allowed for the total between man and gods that neither anarchy or despotism could achieve. Moreover, it was only through this union that justice could be served and the ancient laws and ways could be overturned. With this new social order, man celebrated unprecedented equality, honor and successfulness Works CitedAeschylus. Oresteia. Trans. Peter Meineck. Indianapolis Hackett, 1998.