Sunday, March 17, 2019
Icon or Symbol: A Teachers Moral Dilemma :: Education Teaching Papers
Icon or Symbol A Teachers Moral DilemmaWorks Cited MissingIt all(a) happened so quickly. One heartbeat I was at my blackboard, the next moment I was between two juvenile males who were trying to prove a pride point with their fists. I had, without a conscious thought approximately it, drawn a crown on the board. Next I hear chairs hitting the floor and screams of profanity. I was called a not-so-nice name by champion of my students, followed by his strange comment We know who your favorites in this class are. some other student from across the room overturned his chair and, breath coming fast, managed to get out the words Dont get on her, man. And dont you never good deal with the crown Dont mess with my blood, man Then they were at each others throats and I was between them, not knowing what had happened.I work at a juvenile prison for all male offenders. Quite honestly, I tactile sensation as if my students and I speak different languages sometimes. After talking to students and counselors afterward this incident, I discovered that the crown I had drawn to re amaze Prince juncture of Denmark was interpreted as a gang symbol by the members of my class. By drawing the crown, I had somehow affiliated myself with the Ghetto Boys of Indianapolis. This angered my students who consider themselves members of a rival gang. What would Shakespeare think of such a situation?I cypher the real question is what do I think about such a situation and how do I define my role in the classroom? Peirces theory of distinguishs and his classification from the point of view of the object of the squeeze (representant) is helpful in understanding this classroom incident. Peirce defined a sign as anything which is so determined by something else, called its object, and so determines an effect upon a person, which effect I call its interpretant (Houser 257). In this view, educators use signs all of the time, to move with students. In fact, in his article Toward a Peircean Theory, Nathan Houser relates Peirces belief that signs are the matter, or the substance of thought (257). Peirce goes even further to say that life itself is a train of thought (Houser 256). In other words, life and signs are fundamentally related and unseparable for all humans (Houser 257). As a teacher, I present my students with signs (representants) in hopes of helping them to understand information.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment