Science vs Religion Essays -- Human Evolution vs Relgion

Science is not only compatible with spirituality it is a profound source of spirituality. When we describe our place in an immensity of lightyears and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is sure enough spiritual. The notion that experience and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both. -- Carl SaganStudents bring with them many an(prenominal) assumptions about science, about worship, and about their relationship. These assumptions may impact, positively or negatively, their willingness and ability to engage the scientific study of human origins. This essay is exitd as a guide to begin thinking about science and religion in the context of the possible interactions of apparitional world scans with a scientific account of human evolution and origins. In other words, this essay will apologise how human evolution and religion can pea cefully coexist.What is science?Science is a way to understand spirit by developing explanations for the structures, processes and history of nature that can be tested by observations in laboratories or in the field. Sometimes such observations are direct, like measuring the chemical composition of a rock. Other times these observations are indirect, like determining the presence of an exoplanet through the wobble of its host star. An explanation of some aspect of nature that has been well support by such observations is a theory. Well-substantiated theories are the foundations of human understanding of nature. The pursuit of such understanding is science.What is religion?Religion, or more appropriately religions, are heathenish phenomena comprised of social institutions, traditions of practice, literatures, sacred texts and stories, and sacred places that identify and convey an understanding of ultimate meaning. Religions are very diverse. While it is common for religions to identify the ultimate with a divinity fudge (like the western monotheisms Judaism, Christianity, Islam) or deities, not all do. There are non-theistic religions, like Buddhism.What is the difference between science and religion?Although science does not provide proofs, it does provide explanations. Science depends on deliberate, explicit and formal testing (in the natural world) of explanations for the wa... ...e is practiced without reference to religion. God may be an ultimate explanation, but God is not a scientific explanation. This approach to science is called methodological naturalism. However, this method of isolating religious interests from scientific research is not an example of the separation approach. Historically, this bracketing out of religious questions in the practice of scientific inquiry was promoted by religious thinkers in the 18th and 19th centuries as the most fruitful way to discover penultima rather than ultimate explanations of the structures an d processes of nature.A third possibility for the relationship between science and religion, one of interaction, at minimum holds that dialogue between science and religion can be valuable, more that science and religion can constructively benefit from engagement, and at maximum envisions a convergence of scientific and religious perspectives. Generally, this view encourages an effort to explore the significance of scientific understanding for religious understanding and vice versa. With this approach science remains relevant beyond the classroom for many people who might otherwise ignore scientific findings.