Strict Liability

August 7, 2009 venomous Law- 2 Es hypothesise on Strict Liability Crimes Having no element for Mens Rea, consequently permits punishment on those that may be blameless to a crime. With that fact, there is definitely a wide range of polemical pros and cons. I person altogethery am unbiased either way regarding this topic, for any and all concerns I life are legitimate. What I will set forth here is unbiased opinion and facts to all pros and cons.In this world there are many regular civilians and citizens that may encounter, in any(prenominal) form or another, an inconvenience, mishap or even loss on many degrees due to someones negligence or flagitious obligation. Which will lead me to ones take on the pros or benefit to the existence of stark liability crimes. send-off and foremost, when someone is hurt or harmed, they want recourse and they want it from whomever is liable, or from the closes person to that liable party. So they care nothing about ones blamelessness or mental intent, which in this case the law would not hold prudent anyway.To them and to the law public health and safety come first. For them an act alone is all that would actually need to be proved. For if that were not the case, then the possible victims would not have any palliate under the law. Further more, the benefits to society outweighs the cost of punishing those that may have no true blame. As for the cons in strict liability offenses, one might argue that being held liable without subjective or objective fault may be a violation to the U.S. Constitution. Where this stipulation actually contradicts the Model punishable Code (MPC) etc. on criminal liability and the stature of concurrence. Further more, with there being no actual or effective means on fosterion against strict liability or accidents, leaves a broad range of exceptional blameworthiness. Where they could say we are the victims adversely this could jeopardize society and not protect it, thus curtail much human (e specially professional) activities etc. at the fear of any possible blamable negligence. So here I have just a few to name the least, of pros and cons on strict liability. So as you see we all have some legitimate place or say in this very controversial matter. For all people individuals, civilians, families, cooperations, businesses, functions, police force and all professionals have some form of risk here. Over all I think the law on strict liability is well needed and the sacrifices are well worth the gains for better of for worse.